Showing posts with label Cases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cases. Show all posts
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Sunday, February 3, 2013
Case 8: Save a Mistake Through the Media
Hi guys...!
in this post I will discuss
about the media's role and relationship with
the company. Apparently the media
does not only showing the bad news of corporation, but
also, there are times when
the media used the
company to cover their mistakes.
This case not only occurs in the medium of television or radio, but also it can occur in magazines and newspapers. The power of the media is determining the existence of a company.
There are companies that did not
hesitate to pay the media to cover their mistakes, so that efforts to
improve the public image of the company.
Recently-chairman 'News Corp' Rupert Murdoch, British parliamentary committee examined wiretapping scandal.
Company accused of deliberately blind eye to cases that occurred in the media empire
under his leadership. Murdoch company in the UK, News International, is also accused
of deliberately giving misleading information to lawmakers about the size of the
phone tapping case.Sunday, December 30, 2012
Case 5: Negative Publicity, Companies Assume Different Strategies to Deal With Crisis Management
Negative publicity the company may be attacked at any time. Rapid and
positive response to negative publicity is
a matter of urgency. Negative publicity is something that
must be faced rather than avoided. The company must respond
quickly and appropriately the
negative publicity that the inevitable loss
of sales may be reduced. And it
can save a brand of the company.
The phenomenon of consumer complaints
to the manufacturer because of dissatisfaction with a product is often the case. Some producers were
faced with the law related to it.
As an example the case consumers
of “Nissan
March” who dragged Nissan Indonesia to
court because they feel cheated
about the fuel consumption is not as advertised.
Case 4: Did Janet Jakson’s Wardrobe Malfunction Help GoDaddy.com’s Success?
Janet
Jackson “wardrobe malfunctioned” (Justin Timberlake ripped off her top and
exposed her breast) during a halftime show for Super Bowl XXXVIII, the event
became the focus of media attention for week on end.
Many people who condemn this incident and rate this incident as bad publicity. This incident became the talk crowded,
because even the
Super Bowl XXXVIII very popular in America, especially among teenagers.
But not everyone reacts the
same way to these events. There
are many who think that negative feedback is a highly redundant: by giving so much of public attention the incident give Jackson and Timberlake
just
they want
-
free publicity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)















